Holy Cross safety commitment extends to equipment solutions

Aug 1, 1998 12:00 PM, AC&SSI Staff

           

The College of the Holy Cross is committed to providing a secure, productive environment for its 2,700 students who enjoy some of the most sophisticated, attractive and well-maintained facilities in higher education. The beautiful 174-acre Holy Cross campus in Worcester, Mass., has won five national and international awards for excellence in architecture and landscaping. Physical surroundings reflect the college's overall standards of quality. Over the last 10 years, the college has invested more than $100 million in facilities and maintenance. The college's commitment to campus security and safety extends to equipment solutions. Originally, the school's access control system had been built around its cafeteria. But as security needs began to increase, Holy Cross began to search for an "integratable" security system. The Holy Cross security committee consultant required a sophisticated access control system to monitor nine residence hall exterior entrances with alarm monitoring, and to provide card access to all residence houses. Neil Carmody, assistant director of public safety, chose the Wa-Pac security system from Synergistics, Natick, Mass. The system provides a wide-area, automated, distributed processing system for multiple-site building management, alarm monitoring and physical access control. It is well-suited to Holy Cross' scattered-building campus, which combines direct wire and dial-up communications. Secure campus doors are a top priority. The system permits Holy Cross to restrict access in certain locations through flexible access codes. Vandalism has been reduced, because security can identify witnesses who may have observed an incident. According to Carmody: "Several types of investigations have resulted over the years. In combination with other investigative techniques, the system has helped identify people and situations to find perpetrators." During one alleged incident, Carmody was able to identify more than 47 witnesses who had passed the area where an incident had been reported. But after talking to several witnesses, Carmody discovered no crime had taken place. "The system has reduced our larceny complaints by about 80 percent," he says. "For example, on football weekends we don't have people wandering through our residence buildings. The student population actually makes the security system effective because they become more responsible for their environment, " Carmody explains. Campus ID cards are another component of student security and are required for a majority of campus activities such as food service, purchase of books, access to the pub, library, college events and athletic facilities. Not only do ID cards make the system more effective, but if lost, they can be replaced within 24 hours and the old ones removed from the system. When contemplating the purchase or upgrade of an access control system, Carmody says management must be committed to making the system work. "Our physical plant team conducts regular routine building maintenance and responds to complaints and other required maintenance above and beyond the call of duty."

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.

SUBSCRIBE

Select an Issue April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008 December 1, 2007 November 1, 2007 October 1, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 1, 2007 July 1, 2007 June 1, 2007 IP Security Supplement May 1, 2007 April 1, 2007 March 1, 2007 February 1, 2007 January 1, 2007 School Security December 1, 2006 November 1, 2006 October 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 1, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 1, 2006 February 1, 2006 January 1, 2006 December 1, 2005 November 1, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 1, 2005 August 1, 2005 July 1, 2005 June 1, 2005 May 1, 2005 April 1, 2005 March 1, 2005 February 1, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 1, 2004 November 1, 2004 October 1, 2004 September 1, 2004 August 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 June 1, 2004 May 1, 2004 April 1, 2004 March 1, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 October 1, 1997 September 1, 1997 August 1, 1997 July 1, 1997 June 1, 1997 May 1, 1997 April 1, 1997 March 1, 1997 February 1, 1997 January 1, 1997

This month in Access Control

• Opening Up About Door Closers
• An Enterprise Approach
• The Framework For Open Systems
• On A Higher Plane
• More from April's issue