Raising The Bar On Protecting Nuclear Power Plants

Apr 1, 2003 12:00 PM

           

Security guards at only one out of four nuclear power plants are confident their plant could defeat a terrorist attack, according to interviews conducted in April 2002 by the Project On Government Oversight (POGO), an investigative organization that works with inside sources to improve public policy. POGO randomly contacted and interviewed more than 20 guards protecting 24 reactors at 13 sites last year. The investigation resulted from concerns of current and former guards from commercial nuclear power plants about inadequate security. These guards work at nuclear power plants across the country in all four of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regions. The NRC is obligated to ensure nuclear power plants are operated safely, protecting public health, safety and the environment. To accomplish this, the NRC requires utilities operating reactors to submit security plans for approval. But according to POGO's findings, “the NRC has relied far too much on the nuclear industry to provide insights and there has been virtually no direct communication between the NRC and guard forces.”

Little has changed to bolster security at nuclear power plants since Sept. 11. According to POGO, upgrades that have taken place include only minimal increases in the guard force.

Last month, major security failures in guard forces were discovered at Sandia National Laboratories. Sleeping guards, stolen computer equipment and other events reportedly occurred at the federal government's leading center for security engineering. Sandia Laboratories expressed “serious concerns about the management of the lab's security force.” Other recent security breaches have been reported at Los Alamos National Laboratories and Nevada Test Site.

To prevent further breaches and improve security at nuclear power plants, POGO made recommendations to the NRC, including:

• Consider the security of a plant satisfactory only if it has successfully passed a credible performance test, not because the plant is simply in compliance with NRC regulations;

• Apply a “fatigue rule” to security guards;

• Require a “two-man” rule in vital areas to reduce the risk of insiders;

• Create a prioritized target/asset list; and

• Increase the budget of the Operational Safeguards Response Evaluations (OSRE) staff so it can conduct more frequent and realistic performance tests.

Share Your Story

Every month, we are offering information about managing guard services and leading in-house staff. Among other things, this page will offer an opportunity for readers to share the management lessons they have learned and to provide other helpful information to their peers in the industry.

To offer suggestions, or to contribute to this page, contact Jennifer Pero at 770-618-0135 or e-mail jpero@primediabusiness.com

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.

SUBSCRIBE

Select an Issue April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008 December 1, 2007 November 1, 2007 October 1, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 1, 2007 July 1, 2007 June 1, 2007 IP Security Supplement May 1, 2007 April 1, 2007 March 1, 2007 February 1, 2007 January 1, 2007 School Security December 1, 2006 November 1, 2006 October 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 1, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 1, 2006 February 1, 2006 January 1, 2006 December 1, 2005 November 1, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 1, 2005 August 1, 2005 July 1, 2005 June 1, 2005 May 1, 2005 April 1, 2005 March 1, 2005 February 1, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 1, 2004 November 1, 2004 October 1, 2004 September 1, 2004 August 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 June 1, 2004 May 1, 2004 April 1, 2004 March 1, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 October 1, 1997 September 1, 1997 August 1, 1997 July 1, 1997 June 1, 1997 May 1, 1997 April 1, 1997 March 1, 1997 February 1, 1997 January 1, 1997

This month in Access Control

• Opening Up About Door Closers
• An Enterprise Approach
• The Framework For Open Systems
• On A Higher Plane
• More from April's issue