Managing directories for school security

Mar 13, 2006 3:23 PM

           

Directories play a crucial role in the security architecture of colleges and universities. The problem: there are too many of them.
Such directories contain redundant sets of user IDs and data. And they are managed separately, with different tools and commands. Administrators struggle to maintain consistency between entries and must keep track of user access rights across multiple systems and accounts.
Such synchronization of data among directories is a time-consuming, often manual, job. In addition to wasting many hours on repetitive tasks, IT administrators are hampered in their ability to identify and plug security holes as well as provision and de-provision user access rights in a timely fashion.
As a result, education institutions are increasingly using meta-directories as the basis for campuswide identity and access management (IAM) infrastructure. From a manageability standpoint, meta-directory platforms provide the umbrella infrastructure to synchronize and tie together disparate directories and allow IT managers to centrally administer identity and access management throughout all applications and security systems -- all from a single console. Meta-directories are vital for storing, maintaining and updating identities and related information. The information they house can be used for reference, user authentication and access control.
Meta-directories help strengthen an academic institution's defenses against security threats. Here's how:
* Centralized management: Administrators can monitor and control user access across all IT systems from a single console.
* Rapid provisioning and de-provisioning: Schools can provide access rights for incoming students, faculty and visitors as soon as they arrive on campus. Schools can remove access rights the moment a user leaves. The meta-directory's dynamic links to all relevant directories and security systems ensure that no resources will be overlooked. This minimizes the likelihood that a departing user will retain -- and possibly abuse -- access rights to campus systems data.
* Granular, policy-based control: Meta-directory IAM platforms use preset policies to determine who gets access to what on an increasingly granular level. This is crucial to institutions of higher learning. Administrators need to grant access privileges according to the various student, professor and visitor roles.
* Control of both logical and physical resources: More and more campus environments are working toward a "single sign-on" or single-password approach for both logical IT resources and physical facilities. This is done by connecting meta-directories to smart-card systems to control access to residence halls, computer rooms, laboratories, libraries and other restricted campus areas.
For colleges and universities, meta-directories are critical components of effective IAM solutions -- providing openness and security to myriad types of users. Characteristics to look for when choosing a meta-directory solution include: high performance; a scalable, flexible architecture; high availability and reliability; proprietary support; and interoperability.
This article is excerpted from "A Secure Balance," a story in the Feb. 2006 edition of our sister magazine, American School & University. Click here for the complete article

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.

SUBSCRIBE

Select an Issue April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008 December 1, 2007 November 1, 2007 October 1, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 1, 2007 July 1, 2007 June 1, 2007 IP Security Supplement May 1, 2007 April 1, 2007 March 1, 2007 February 1, 2007 January 1, 2007 School Security December 1, 2006 November 1, 2006 October 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 1, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 1, 2006 February 1, 2006 January 1, 2006 December 1, 2005 November 1, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 1, 2005 August 1, 2005 July 1, 2005 June 1, 2005 May 1, 2005 April 1, 2005 March 1, 2005 February 1, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 1, 2004 November 1, 2004 October 1, 2004 September 1, 2004 August 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 June 1, 2004 May 1, 2004 April 1, 2004 March 1, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 October 1, 1997 September 1, 1997 August 1, 1997 July 1, 1997 June 1, 1997 May 1, 1997 April 1, 1997 March 1, 1997 February 1, 1997 January 1, 1997

This month in Access Control

• Opening Up About Door Closers
• An Enterprise Approach
• The Framework For Open Systems
• On A Higher Plane
• More from April's issue