Power generation sector vulnerable to attack?

Mar 27, 2006 3:02 PM

           

While most U.S. refineries are well prepared to identify, repel or neutralize man-made attempts to disrupt operations, it does not mean that refineries are operating at a "best practice" level with respect to physical and cyber security, a critical infrastructure security expert tells the Denver Business Journal.
The U.S. power generation sector -- based on observations at numerous plants and transmission facilities -- is woefully behind in deploying both hard and soft methods to keep hackers and terrorists from disrupting operations, according to Ken Miller, CEO of Denver-based Ensuren Corp., a provider of security solutions for critical infrastructure.
He clarifies that the huge conglomerates that own most of America's refining capacity have put together more comprehensive security programs that establish standards for information technology and security in critical control environments. In mid-tier and smaller refineries, however, this effort has not happened yet.
But the refineries are more sophisticated than power generators in terms of security, Miller says. He goes on to say that it would require a comparatively small investment of time, manpower and money for the power generation sector's security initiatives to reach the sophisticated level of the refineries.
While the process control technology in refining is almost identical to that in power generation, Miller points out several differences, the most important being that power plants are more likely to have process control systems in unsecured areas, easily available to anyone who has access to the plant. Generally, more technicians work on process control systems in power generation, while more engineers work on process control systems in refining.
He says the power generation sector needs to focus more attention on securing all layers of the process control environment -- facilities, personnel, networks and systems. "At some locations, as soon as you enter the property, you realize that the physical security is so weak that cyber security almost becomes moot," Miller says.
In terms of computer-based attacks, both the power generation and refining sectors must be ever-vigilant against a malware intrusion, he adds. There is a very high propensity for the propagation of malware through process control networks, either intentionally or accidentally, that can bring down view and control of critical processes.
"While the refining industry is voluntarily moving into what we call cyber security, we are finding fewer power generation groups doing the same," Miller says. "The power generation sector, however, is being pressured by the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) to focus more on defense against cyber attacks."
Please visit The Denver Business Journal to read the full article.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.

SUBSCRIBE

Select an Issue April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008 December 1, 2007 November 1, 2007 October 1, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 1, 2007 July 1, 2007 June 1, 2007 IP Security Supplement May 1, 2007 April 1, 2007 March 1, 2007 February 1, 2007 January 1, 2007 School Security December 1, 2006 November 1, 2006 October 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 1, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 1, 2006 February 1, 2006 January 1, 2006 December 1, 2005 November 1, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 1, 2005 August 1, 2005 July 1, 2005 June 1, 2005 May 1, 2005 April 1, 2005 March 1, 2005 February 1, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 1, 2004 November 1, 2004 October 1, 2004 September 1, 2004 August 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 June 1, 2004 May 1, 2004 April 1, 2004 March 1, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 October 1, 1997 September 1, 1997 August 1, 1997 July 1, 1997 June 1, 1997 May 1, 1997 April 1, 1997 March 1, 1997 February 1, 1997 January 1, 1997

This month in Access Control

• Opening Up About Door Closers
• An Enterprise Approach
• The Framework For Open Systems
• On A Higher Plane
• More from April's issue