Best practices for use of RF technology in ID management

Jan 30, 2007 10:46 AM

           

Using radio frequency (RF) technology for identity management has become a balancing act between security and privacy. The Smart Card Alliance Identity Council has released guidance regarding best practices for organizations implementing the technology in identity management systems.

In "Best Practices for the Use of RF-Enabled Technology in Identity Management," the Alliance provides recommended guidelines for issuers of ID credentials using RF technology to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and validity of identity information and to protect the credential holder's privacy. The publication and accompanying frequently asked questions document also address common misunderstandings about the use of RF technology to transmit identity information, which have led to questions about the security and privacy of RF-enabled ID credentials.

"There is a public misperception that all RF-enabled technology is synonymous with RFID," says Randy Vanderhoof, executive director of the Alliance. "These new documents achieve a twofold purpose: They provide rules for good behavior when using RF-enabled technology in identity management, and they clearly delineate the differences between RFID and contactless smart cards that use RF and provide security and privacy protection in identity applications."

Radio frequency identification (RFID) is commonly used in product tags for tracking and supply chain management. Contactless smart cards are RF-enabled devices with onboard computers designed to protect identity information and its communication. Widespread corporate and government use, including the worldwide e-passport program, has validated contactless smart card technology as a secure, reliable way to transmit ID information.

Key elements of the Alliance's best practices for using RF technology in ID management call on credential issuers to:

* Implement security techniques, such as mutual authentication, cryptography and verification of message integrity, to protect identity information throughout the application.

* Ensure protection of all user and credential information stored in central identity system databases, allowing access to specific information only according to designated access rights.

* Notify the user as to the nature and purpose of the personally identifiable information (PII) collected -- its usage and length of retention.

* Notify the user about what information is used; how and when it is accessed and by whom; and provide a redress mechanism to correct information and to resolve disputes.

Vanderhoof emphasizes that RF-enabled smart cards are able to meet all the guidelines in the Alliance's best practices document. The use of RFID tags in identity credentials, however -- due to their long read range of up to 25 feet and lack of appropriate security features -- could leave users open to the types of fraud and identity theft most feared by privacy advocates and government officials, he says.

For more information, visit www.smartcardalliance.org

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.

SUBSCRIBE

Select an Issue April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008 December 1, 2007 November 1, 2007 October 1, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 1, 2007 July 1, 2007 June 1, 2007 IP Security Supplement May 1, 2007 April 1, 2007 March 1, 2007 February 1, 2007 January 1, 2007 School Security December 1, 2006 November 1, 2006 October 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 1, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 1, 2006 February 1, 2006 January 1, 2006 December 1, 2005 November 1, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 1, 2005 August 1, 2005 July 1, 2005 June 1, 2005 May 1, 2005 April 1, 2005 March 1, 2005 February 1, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 1, 2004 November 1, 2004 October 1, 2004 September 1, 2004 August 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 June 1, 2004 May 1, 2004 April 1, 2004 March 1, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 October 1, 1997 September 1, 1997 August 1, 1997 July 1, 1997 June 1, 1997 May 1, 1997 April 1, 1997 March 1, 1997 February 1, 1997 January 1, 1997

This month in Access Control

• Opening Up About Door Closers
• An Enterprise Approach
• The Framework For Open Systems
• On A Higher Plane
• More from April's issue