RFID faces adoption challenges in retail store environments

Apr 25, 2006 12:31 PM

           

RFID systems spending for retail in-store applications reached nearly $88 million globally in 2005, according to a report by Venture Development Corp. (VDC), which forecasts growth of more than 35 percent per year in retailer spending on RFID for in-store point-of-sale (POS) applications through 2010, when the market is expected to reach nearly $400 million.
Big retailer interest in and commitment to RFID have been well documented. Technical approaches and application priorities are divergent, but their goals are fairly consistent. VDC telephone surveys of retailers conducted during Q1 2006 reveal a common vision for RFID retail POS applications that includes the following:
* accurate and efficient inventory control;
* consequent cost reductions related to better inventory management;
* optimal stock levels based on real-time customer activity/demand;
* reduction of out-of-stocks;
* lower warehousing costs via automated processes and improved tracking efficiencies; and
* improved margins associated with the cost reductions cited above.
The key to RFID for retail in-store applications is the cost-effectiveness, reliability and ease-of-use of item-level tagging solutions. Without item-level tagging, VDC believes that most value propositions, revenue enhancement goals and margin improvement objectives will not be attainable. Some of the most significant challenges to item-level solution development, deployment, and operation include:
* Software coding and proper systems integration: Conversion code needs to be written to convert all existing databases so that a retailer can cart Electronic Product Code (EPC) information. Managing the enormous volumes of data generated by RFID systems is expected to be a complex task, requiring significant retailer attention;
* Unsynchronized adoption across the supply chain: Retailers are concerned that their IT suppliers and distributors may not be quick to implement RFID. Retailers and manufacturers need to collaborate on RFID efforts to receive the full benefit, including determining how best to place/position RFID transponders onto products or into packages in the most cost-effective and efficient way;
* Extensive training requirements of new systems: Retail personnel must be trained on how to use the new systems and to learn new job functions. In addition, some retailers may need to renegotiate labor contracts due to collective bargaining agreements regarding work rules for employees; and
* Cost of technology replacement: In addition to the costs of system components and business process changes, there is also the potential expense of replacing existing scanners in stores with new devices that are bar-code, magnetic stripe and RFID enabled. With retailers supporting more and more checkout lanes across hundreds of stores, the number of devices that will potentially be replaced/upgraded is significant.
"Item-level tagging will be rolled out slowly, over time," says Michael J. Liard, Director of VDC's RFID Annual Research Service. "Deployment decisions will be determined as much by the value (or liability) of items merchandised, as by the volume of units sold. Current implementation costs - particularly tag prices, are simply too high for widespread adoption."
For more information, visit www.vdc-corp.com/autoid/annual/05/br05-21.html

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.

SUBSCRIBE

Select an Issue April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008 December 1, 2007 November 1, 2007 October 1, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 1, 2007 July 1, 2007 June 1, 2007 IP Security Supplement May 1, 2007 April 1, 2007 March 1, 2007 February 1, 2007 January 1, 2007 School Security December 1, 2006 November 1, 2006 October 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 1, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 1, 2006 February 1, 2006 January 1, 2006 December 1, 2005 November 1, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 1, 2005 August 1, 2005 July 1, 2005 June 1, 2005 May 1, 2005 April 1, 2005 March 1, 2005 February 1, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 1, 2004 November 1, 2004 October 1, 2004 September 1, 2004 August 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 June 1, 2004 May 1, 2004 April 1, 2004 March 1, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 October 1, 1997 September 1, 1997 August 1, 1997 July 1, 1997 June 1, 1997 May 1, 1997 April 1, 1997 March 1, 1997 February 1, 1997 January 1, 1997

This month in Access Control

• Opening Up About Door Closers
• An Enterprise Approach
• The Framework For Open Systems
• On A Higher Plane
• More from April's issue