Cyberspace Security Opinion Varies Across Board

Nov 27, 2007 4:25 PM

           

How the military and how business and industry view cyberspace is different than how everyday people view it, an expert in security for Microsoft told The Shreveport Times.

The military sees cyberspace as "the electromagnetic spectrum," from copper wires to microwaves, where communications, control, intelligence and energy can be delivered to defend, destroy or shape the world, just like land, air, sea and space.

"But some 85-90 percent of what is critical infrastructure in cyberspace is not in government hands," says David Aucsmith, who in more than 20 years in telecommunications security work has dealt with the military, business and government agencies.

"It is in the public sector somewhere. So I would define cyberspace as the publicly accessible communications infrastructure, certainly a large and very generic term, but the Internet fits," he told The Shreveport Times. "From an attack point of view, from a cyber security point of view, it means that some guy sitting in Italy can do something to someone in some other place, or an asset they own. If they can do that, then it's cyberspace."

He will be part of an industry panel at the "Fly and Fight in Cyberspace" symposium at the Shreveport Convention Center, discussing cyberspace and security. The overall topic will be "The Evolution of Threats to Cyber Systems and How Industry is Posturing to Address Those Threats."

The moderator will be Col. Warren Ward, one of the architects of the Cyber Command now forming at Barksdale.

Earlier this year, the Baltic nation of Estonia was the target of an orchestrated denial-of-service attack, where it was flooded with e-mails and demands on its servers that shut down its education, banking, government and other services for weeks. Microsoft, which supplied many of the systems Estonia was using, helped them. "We actually spent a lot of time helping the Estonians deal with that," Aucsmith says.

But, he added, "Estonia received chaos but it didn't collapse. It had a great deal of difficulty. It isn't nearly as sophisticated an environment as much of the West is at this point in time. And it recovered rather rapidly."

The attacks also didn't come paired with a physical or military attack, and that's how Aucsmith says he believes cyber assaults will play out over time.

"If you look at the Estonia attacks, if they had come in conjunction with someone invading the country for example, then they would have been devastating," he says.

"I am not one of those who agrees that a digital Pearl Harbor is something that is a likely occurrence. The systems are resilient enough where that type of thing, a massive collapse and failure, is unlikely. What I think is far more likely are targeted, specific attacks on specific institutions or specific individuals. Whether that's criminal or that's nation-state, that's something that's certainly within the realm of possibility and is happening today."

The symposium, sponsored by 8th Air Force, the Cyber Innovation Center and handful of other entities, will focus on defense and offense. So far, just fewer than 1,500 people have signed up for the symposium.

The Shreveport Times reports that the exhibiting companies represent 29 different states and total some 100 companies and organizations, and that CISCO is bringing a large truck that will be on the exhibit hall floor that displays and demonstrates their equipment.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media Inc.

SUBSCRIBE

Select an Issue April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008 December 1, 2007 November 1, 2007 October 1, 2007 September 1, 2007 August 1, 2007 July 1, 2007 June 1, 2007 IP Security Supplement May 1, 2007 April 1, 2007 March 1, 2007 February 1, 2007 January 1, 2007 School Security December 1, 2006 November 1, 2006 October 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 1, 2006 July 1, 2006 June 1, 2006 May 1, 2006 April 1, 2006 March 1, 2006 February 1, 2006 January 1, 2006 December 1, 2005 November 1, 2005 October 1, 2005 September 1, 2005 August 1, 2005 July 1, 2005 June 1, 2005 May 1, 2005 April 1, 2005 March 1, 2005 February 1, 2005 January 1, 2005 December 1, 2004 November 1, 2004 October 1, 2004 September 1, 2004 August 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 July 1, 2004 June 1, 2004 May 1, 2004 April 1, 2004 March 1, 2004 February 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 December 1, 2003 November 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 September 1, 2003 August 1, 2003 July 1, 2003 June 1, 2003 May 1, 2003 April 1, 2003 March 1, 2003 February 1, 2003 January 1, 2003 December 1, 2002 November 1, 2002 October 1, 2002 September 1, 2002 August 1, 2002 July 1, 2002 June 1, 2002 May 1, 2002 April 1, 2002 March 1, 2002 February 1, 2002 January 1, 2002 December 1, 2001 November 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 September 1, 2001 August 1, 2001 July 1, 2001 June 1, 2001 May 1, 2001 April 1, 2001 March 1, 2001 February 1, 2001 January 1, 2001 December 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 September 1, 2000 August 1, 2000 July 1, 2000 June 1, 2000 May 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 March 1, 2000 February 1, 2000 January 1, 2000 December 1, 1999 November 1, 1999 October 1, 1999 September 1, 1999 August 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 June 1, 1999 May 1, 1999 April 1, 1999 March 1, 1999 February 1, 1999 January 1, 1999 December 1, 1998 November 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 September 1, 1998 August 1, 1998 July 1, 1998 June 1, 1998 May 1, 1998 April 1, 1998 March 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 January 1, 1998 December 1, 1997 November 1, 1997 October 1, 1997 September 1, 1997 August 1, 1997 July 1, 1997 June 1, 1997 May 1, 1997 April 1, 1997 March 1, 1997 February 1, 1997 January 1, 1997

This month in Access Control

• Opening Up About Door Closers
• An Enterprise Approach
• The Framework For Open Systems
• On A Higher Plane
• More from April's issue